Join Early Access
Sample reportFictional ticker · score-interpretation demo

How to read a CQ Alpha score.

This walks through one score on CQDEMO, an obviously fictional ticker. The numbers are illustrative examples chosen to show how a real report reads — composite score, confidence, the nine factors, sources, and snapshot status. It is not a real security, not a recommendation, and not investment advice.

cq-market / score / CQDEMOsample
CQDEMOFictional Demo Industries
3-Month horizonRisk: Medium
73/ 100

Composite model score

82%High
◷ point-in-time snapshotas of 2026-06-28
What the composite means

A 0–100 ranking of signal confluence across the nine factors — higher means more factors line up constructively. It is not a price target, a probability, or a promise of return.

What confidence means

How much reliable data backed this score. When a feed is missing, the affected factor neutralizes and confidence drops — a thinly-supported score can't masquerade as a strong one.

The nine factors, read one by one
/
MomentumPrice

Blends 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month price returns into one trend reading.

81
QualityFundamental

Composite of profit margins, return on equity, and debt-to-equity.

74
ValueFundamental

Composite of valuation multiples relative to peers. Cheaper multiples read higher.

38
GrowthFundamental

Composite of revenue growth and earnings-per-share growth.

69
Earnings RevisionsEstimates

The direction analysts are revising their earnings estimates.

no reliable estimate feed — neutralized

Risk ControlPrice

Combines historical volatility, drawdown depth, and beta deviation. Steadier reads higher.

62
Institutional ActivityInstitutional

Institutional ownership derived from SEC EDGAR 13F filings, or a bounded proxy.

77
Sentiment & NewsSentiment

Aggregated direction of news flow for a company.

55
Technical StructureTechnical

Reads price relative to its moving averages and their structure.

71
What pushed the score up
  • Momentum. Persistent 1–6 month uptrend — the strongest single read.
  • Institutional Activity. Broad institutional ownership from 13F filings.
  • Quality. Healthy margins and conservative leverage.
What held the score back
  • Value. Richly priced versus peers — the lowest factor read.
  • Earnings Revisions. No reliable estimate feed, so it neutralizes and lowers confidence.
Where the inputs came from
Tiingo· price · delayedFMP· fundamentals · cachedSEC EDGAR· 13F · quarterlyAlpha Vantage· fallback only

Every factor carries its own source and an “as of” time. Freshness — fresh, cached, or degraded — is always visible, so you know how current each input is. Missing data is neutralized, never invented.

Snapshot & forward-test status

This score is stored as a point-in-time snapshot. What happens after each snapshot is measured later, across horizons. That forward-test record is still accumulating — it is not yet a performance claim.

Data limitations

Scores reflect data that can be delayed, revised, or wrong. The universe is a fixed list with selection bias. The model has no view on your goals, timeline, taxes, or risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

CreativeQuant Market provides educational market research and model-generated watchlists. It is not personalized financial advice, investment advice, or a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Markets involve risk, including loss of principal. Model outputs can be wrong, incomplete, or outdated. Always do your own research.